Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/458665617760194562
toast sunk in bacon grease (not that course)
Source Link
random Mod
  • 15.2k
  • 42
  • 63

Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by edits made by anonymous usersedits?

Although I think there have been many good contributions by anonymous users, would it make sense that a near 100% change not be allowed? Of coarse, we

We have the review process I guess, but it just seems that it probably should not get that far when this much of the original post is modified.   

anonymous user. 

This was not an audit..as as I thought it probably was.

Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by edits made by anonymous users?

Although I think there have been many good contributions by anonymous users, would it make sense that a near 100% change not be allowed? Of coarse, we have the review process I guess, but it just seems that it probably should not get that far when this much of the original post is modified.  anonymous user. This was not an audit..as I thought it probably was.

Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by anonymous edits?

Although I think there have been many good contributions by anonymous users, would it make sense that a near 100% change not be allowed?

We have the review process, but it just seems that it probably should not get that far when this much of the original post is modified. 

anonymous user. 

This was not an audit as I thought it probably was.

Source Link
Carl B
  • 6.7k
  • 13
  • 18

Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by edits made by anonymous users?

Although I think there have been many good contributions by anonymous users, would it make sense that a near 100% change not be allowed? Of coarse, we have the review process I guess, but it just seems that it probably should not get that far when this much of the original post is modified. anonymous user. This was not an audit..as I thought it probably was.