Timeline for Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by anonymous edits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 at 9:49 | comment | added | Carl B | @random - I have seen that mods can see what posts have been made by individuals. Is it possible to see the activity anonymous users supply and the number of closed or rejected activity is credited to that log on? Or a percentage of active good vs. closed / deleted / rejected activity? | |
| May 3, 2014 at 0:24 | comment | added | Anonymous Penguin | @CarlB Yes, this does seem suspicious. However, I doubt that these kinds of edits that only leave "the" in place are common, and it'd be really hard to create a filter to block this kind of stuff without removing all the good contributions, too. | |
| May 1, 2014 at 19:00 | answer | added | Excellll | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 30, 2014 at 0:57 | answer | added | Scott - Слава Україні | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 25, 2014 at 0:09 | comment | added | Carl B | @Bob - Well, at least on this example when only the words "the" and "to" are left from the original post it would seem a good candidate for the edit to not even get to review. I could be wrong. | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 14:38 | comment | added | Bob | How would you determine the cutoff? | |
| Apr 22, 2014 at 17:56 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/458665617760194562 | ||
| Apr 22, 2014 at 13:45 | answer | added | bwDraco | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 22, 2014 at 13:21 | answer | added | allquixotic | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 21, 2014 at 13:34 | answer | added | Raystafarian | timeline score: 11 | |
| Apr 20, 2014 at 17:58 | answer | added | Jon | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 20, 2014 at 17:25 | history | edited | randomMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
toast sunk in bacon grease (not that course)
|
| Apr 20, 2014 at 5:13 | history | asked | Carl B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |