Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, the review system detects and prevents duplicate canned commentsthe review system detects and prevents duplicate canned comments.

On the other hand, if the existing comment is manually written, adding a canned comment can sometimes be helpful if it explains the problem in more detail or offers useful links (e.g. to the FAQ or some Meta post). When in doubt, I'd say err on the side of more information for the author of the post, rather than less.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, the review system detects and prevents duplicate canned comments.

On the other hand, if the existing comment is manually written, adding a canned comment can sometimes be helpful if it explains the problem in more detail or offers useful links (e.g. to the FAQ or some Meta post). When in doubt, I'd say err on the side of more information for the author of the post, rather than less.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, the review system detects and prevents duplicate canned comments.

On the other hand, if the existing comment is manually written, adding a canned comment can sometimes be helpful if it explains the problem in more detail or offers useful links (e.g. to the FAQ or some Meta post). When in doubt, I'd say err on the side of more information for the author of the post, rather than less.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

added 311 characters in body
Source Link
Indrek
  • 24.7k
  • 13
  • 12

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, I believethe review system detects and prevents duplicate canned comments.

On the other hand, if you choose the same cannedexisting comment that someone else has already postedis manually written, yours won'tadding a canned comment can sometimes be postedhelpful if it explains the problem in more detail or offers useful links (to avoid duplicate commentse.g. to the FAQ or some Meta post). When in doubt, I'd say err on the side of more information for the author of the post, rather than less.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, I believe if you choose the same canned comment that someone else has already posted, yours won't be posted (to avoid duplicate comments).

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, the review system detects and prevents duplicate canned comments.

On the other hand, if the existing comment is manually written, adding a canned comment can sometimes be helpful if it explains the problem in more detail or offers useful links (e.g. to the FAQ or some Meta post). When in doubt, I'd say err on the side of more information for the author of the post, rather than less.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

added 148 characters in body
Source Link
Indrek
  • 24.7k
  • 13
  • 12

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, I believe if you choose the same canned comment that someone else has already posted, yours won't be posted (to avoid duplicate comments).

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate.

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Yes, when someone else has already posted an applicable comment (either a canned one, or manually written), selecting the "no comment needed" option is totally appropriate. In fact, I believe if you choose the same canned comment that someone else has already posted, yours won't be posted (to avoid duplicate comments).

If you want, you can also go and upvote the existing comment, to add more weight to it.

Source Link
Indrek
  • 24.7k
  • 13
  • 12
Loading