Timeline for 2014 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 30, 2014 at 13:07 | comment | added | Malachi | not just one of my questions, nearly all of them. even an accepted answer with no votes. answers with no votes don't count as an answer on a question until they have one positive vote, so technically those are unanswered questions. | |
| Apr 30, 2014 at 2:41 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @Malachi the type of activity I see here is sporadic, I see questions and answers with no votes either way - I have had answers that sat since the last time I was active with no votes or views, I thought the site was dying so I left yeah that shows how far you're disconnected with the community and expectations if you think activity here is sporadic. Lack of activity on one of your questions and you believed the site was dead. I have no words for that. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 21:21 | comment | added | Malachi | @JonathanGarber, the type of activity I see here is sporadic, I see questions and answers with no votes either way, I also see plenty of questions that should have been closed right away (and those are 2-3 years old) that is the kind of activity that makes me not want to be active in a site, this site needs more voting, more searching through the questions to weed out the bad ones and raise up the good ones. I have had answers that sat since the last time I was active with no votes or views, I thought the site was dying so I left I am back now. and will go for some badges. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 20:55 | comment | added | Jonathan Garber | The issue is not that your writing style is different from anyone else. The issue is not your reputation. The issue, at least insofar as I see it, is that what you have written here feels unsure. Whether or nor you intended it this way, it comes across like that, and the community in general doesn't care for that kind of hesitancy in moderators. (There's also the fact that your activity on SU was. . . sporadic, at best, up until April 22, and your Meta participation non-existant. That's not relevant to this particular question, but it might explain peoples' reaction to your self-nomination.) | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:53 | comment | added | Malachi | I find it odd that I agree with everything that @JourneymanGeek wrote in his answers and think in a similar manner on each issue, and yet somehow that all gets lost in translation, because I don't have the same writing style as others or maybe because I don't have the same amount of reputation so I am down voted to oblivion. Maybe it is my lack of Time spent on this site. I won't Withdraw, I can see myself as a mod, maybe not this time, maybe not this site, so I will ride it out until I can ride no more. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:31 | comment | added | Ruskes | If I am upset or not is not the question here. The way it is written, points to a person not been very organized and tends to shoot form the hip. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | Malachi | @nhinkle, how so? | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | Malachi | thank you for your input @Buscar웃 but I have plenty of time to do the job. Are you upset that I didn't put the questions in order? | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | From the answers to these questions, you appear to be woefully under-qualified for this position. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:17 | comment | added | Ruskes | that is a (-1) from me, for been completely disorganized and for your choice of skipping important questions. You are missing the opportunity to have us learn about you. My conclusion right now is you do not have the time to do the job. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 17:53 | history | edited | Malachi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added more answers.
|
| Apr 29, 2014 at 16:31 | comment | added | Malachi | I apologize but that is what I meant @KronoS, master of few things and able to do other things. that is why I worded it the way I did. I believe that one Mod will not be required to do everything all the time | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 16:04 | comment | added | James Mertz |
I should specialize in a couple of mod aspects while I understand what you're trying to say here I have to disagree. Moderators have to be versatile and able to handle any and all situation that may arise. There's a high chance that you may be the only mod on SU and a ton of situations may arise. You'll have to be able to handle them all as they come to you.
|
|
| Apr 29, 2014 at 14:17 | history | answered | Malachi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |