Timeline for Why was my VLQ flag rejected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2014 at 17:26 | comment | added | Valmiky Arquissandas | Well, this comment thread has been enlightening! I've had a couple of VLQ flags being declined because they are just bad answers, and the line wasn't very clear to me. I hope I'll start using it better from now on. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:56 | comment | added | slhck Mod | To be honest, I've personally always wanted to get rid of the VLQ flag altogether. Many people misuse it and just raise the flag instead of voting appropriately. It's often used as a "I don't like this post" thing. (Not that this is the case here, but …) | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:53 | comment | added | gronostaj | I initially wanted to use the custom flag, but then I read VLQ description and it fitted perfectly: content problems and unsalvageable. Maybe we should do something with that description. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:49 | comment | added | slhck Mod | It's utterly useless, I agree. But it's attempting to answer a question. That's why you should downvote it. Moderators really aren't supposed to have to read the question and then evaluate whether an answer is suitable or not. Unless it's a clear-cut case, like the OP asking how to dual-boot Linux and Windows, and the answer is saying that they need to buy a WiFi adapter. But even then, a custom flag should mention that, not a standard flag. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:41 | comment | added | gronostaj | That thing has literally nothing to do with USB. It's a 12V to 110V car inverter. It's for charging with a regular laptop charger in a car, not through USB and OP didn't even mention that he wants to use it in a car. It's not only useless but doesn't answer the question at all. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:35 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |