Timeline for Should we be having periodic, full throttle cleanups?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 26, 2014 at 13:56 | history | edited | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Sep 15, 2014 at 7:27 | answer | added | Oliver SalzburgMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 11, 2014 at 19:58 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/American#Adjective>). (its = possessive, it's = "it is" or "it has". See for example <http://www.wikihow.com/Use-its-and-it's>.)
|
| Sep 10, 2014 at 0:23 | comment | added | Robotnik | @damryfbfnetsi - I was thinking that the limit would be ignored for the duration of the weekend - the idea was to encourage edits. But yeah JG is right, it would require Dev intervention. | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 0:09 | comment | added | gparyani | @Robotnik Given that the maximum rep you can earn from having suggested edits approved is 1000, if your idea was to be the case, you'd need only 250 edits, not 500, to max out. | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 0:06 | comment | added | gparyani | @JourneymanGeek That's a better idea, keeping in mind that it's only CMs and developers who have the ability to post system messages, and not moderators. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 6:09 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | This isn't 'official' in the SE Corporate official sort of way. Its something someone who happens to be a mod, and is annoyed at a problem we're trying to fix, fixing it. We can have a banner without too much trouble saying its tag-fix weekend. I'd rather not require active cm/dev intervention. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 6:05 | comment | added | Robotnik | If we can get official word on it, What about a "double-xp" weekend? Instead of +2, make it +4 per edit or something | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 23:07 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Thats un-necessarily complicating things. I'll look at getting a community moderator message so people know. If we could trivially, and without dev-bothering do that, this would be easier. If we do happen to have unscheduled maintainance, we can always adjust our edit window. | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 23:03 | history | edited | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Sep 8, 2014 at 16:19 | comment | added | gparyani | What if the site happens to be locked in "read-only mode" during this scheduled time? We should let the SE team know that they should not conduct tests during this time. Additionally, maybe you should also tell them to temporarily show the "recommended" homepage (stackoverflow.com/?tab=recommended) during this time (so as not to show a filled "active" homepage). | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 13:02 | comment | added | user | So 27th 00:00 until 28th 24:00 UTC? Or 27th 00:00 until 27th 24:00? | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 9:00 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Start of the 27th midnight | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 8:58 | comment | added | user | Is that midnight 00:00, or midnight 24:00? | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 20:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/508717559797927936 | ||
| Sep 6, 2014 at 23:17 | comment | added | jww | Just need to motivate folks.... +2 for each cleanup should get the rep ho's in motion. It would probably benefit the various queues too. It beats the ostrich algorithm when dealing with the back logs. Or maybe each elected mod should be able to designate to a hand picked team of 4 or 5. That's a 5x mod multiplier. | |
| Sep 6, 2014 at 1:11 | answer | added | Carl B | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 5, 2014 at 3:46 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | We can't. I wish we did. You can see a full official list of our powers here. Practically outside more powerful tools, and one shot kills of closed and deleted questions and spammers, its not all that different from being a 20Ker. If non bumping edits were possible, I'm pretty sure someone would have already handled the tag situation. | |
| Sep 5, 2014 at 3:42 | comment | added | Robotnik | I suppose this raises the question of what powers do mods have? I always thought 'edit without bumping' and 'mass retag' were things you guys could do, and you were just waiting for (overwhelming) community consensus before acting? | |
| Sep 4, 2014 at 15:04 | history | edited | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2014 at 14:57 | answer | added | allquixotic | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 4, 2014 at 14:52 | answer | added | allquixotic | timeline score: 13 | |
| Sep 4, 2014 at 14:39 | history | asked | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |