Skip to main content

Timeline for Stop, Look, Listen!

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
Apr 21, 2015 at 8:34 vote accept Fazer87
Apr 21, 2015 at 7:06 history edited slhckMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1200 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 5:35 comment added slhck Mod @Scott The software itself may be fine. We need to come up with a way to involve the community when it comes to fighting spam and unfair product advertisement. Also, I'm not saying everyone should meticulously check every user profile when reviewing. I'm also not saying the audit system is completely broken—it's just not perfect. A regular user may just not have the necessary tools to verify a post as spam.
Apr 21, 2015 at 4:58 comment added Scott - Слава Україні Wow; I would have said “Looks OK” too.  McAfee SiteAdvisor, Norton Safe Web, and software.informer all indicate that that site is OK.
Apr 21, 2015 at 3:55 comment added Sathyajith Bhat Mod @Scott i.imgur.com/yJm9yH7.png Also, slhck refers to the former
Apr 20, 2015 at 22:34 comment added Scott - Слава Україні (Cont’d) …  (2) What are you saying (bottom line)?  Are you saying, “When you review low quality posts, you should look at the profiles of the users involved, and look at their posting history for patterns of abuse. Also, search for key words from the review post (in one of the big name search engines) to see whether it was copied (and pasted) from somewhere.”?  Or are you saying, “The audit system is broken; 10% of audits are flawed. But don’t worry, be happy: as long as you get at least 88.8% of audits correct, we won’t release the hounds.”?
Apr 20, 2015 at 22:33 comment added Scott - Слава Україні (1) I followed the link in the question, and all I saw was “answer not found” / “question not found.”  In the interest of openness, would you please undelete them, or (probably better yet) copy them somewhere that the rest of us can see (e.g., into the above question)?  … (Cont’d)
Apr 20, 2015 at 16:27 history answered slhckMod CC BY-SA 3.0