Timeline for Spam detection in answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jul 6, 2015 at 17:52 | comment | added | Psycogeek | It is a sweet answer with accuracy (and reality) and ALL the points to concider when working with and installing ram sticks. A culmination of 20 other Q&As out there in one. | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 13:48 | comment | added | bertieb | No doubt someone with knowledge will weigh in, but at a guess, length-versus-reputation/newness-of-account? I can't find a relevant part in the help centre, but one of the question flags notes "a few paragraphs" as a good intended answer length: Too broad: "There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs." | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 4:24 | comment | added | fixer1234 | I think the spam detector has brain damage. | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 3:57 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 483 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jul 6, 2015 at 3:48 | comment | added | Picotin | @Psycogeek: Done! Happily, meta did not flag it as “looking like spam”, perhaps because it’s part of a question rather than an answer… | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 3:46 | history | edited | Picotin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added the answer that I was trying to post to help with troubleshooting.
|
| Jul 6, 2015 at 2:29 | comment | added | Psycogeek | post the text of the intended answer, below your question, it might be able to be determined from that what the machine triggers off of. | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 1:00 | history | asked | Picotin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |