And some of these aren't even meta questions... I'd retag them all myself, but I don't want to fill the front page with old questions. superuser
-
1The fact is that superuser actually means something, for some of these questions.– Gnoupi ModCommented Aug 1, 2010 at 9:24
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
Maybe go with [root] instead of [superuser] for the *nix ones, and [administrator] for the Windows ones?
I think this suggestion by Hello71 makes a lot of sense, particularly since as Hyperslug said..
Serverfault itself does not use a [superuser] tag
answered Nov 14, 2010 at 5:14
Deleted all those that were Meta related.
Since there are only seven left, go ahead and retag them.
It'll be a minor flooding on the front page, but it'll be quick.
They do look like they're valid uses of the [superuser] tag though.
-
1Maybe go with
[root]instead of[superuser]for the *nix ones, and[administrator]for the Windows ones?– Hello71Commented Aug 1, 2010 at 16:58 -
Tough call. It's a confusing term for our site, but superuser is a valid term for a generic administrator. It's worth noting that Serverfault itself does not use a
[superuser]tag. Maybe escalate this to Washington? Commented Aug 1, 2010 at 17:29 -
@hyperslug: It's still only about SU, not the SE/SO engine.– Hello71Commented Aug 7, 2010 at 14:46