Johnny One of the things pointed out that the FAQs are not as clear as they need to be. on the other side of that, people are not going to read a whole book to ask a simple question.
There either is some imperfection in the understanding , or there is 300 page loads of rules data, that I sure as heck am not going to read.
On one side it needs full clarity instead of Ghestapo descisions based on few, on the other side achieving full clarity requires either having been bashed around till you find the niche the site and questions fit into, or having to read a massive book on what is and isnt allowable and appretiated.
Even with this massive book of SU Legislated point by point facts on what is and what isnt allowed. arguing each point can continue till the cows come home still. Picking points out of the huge legislation could then be applied to concider EACH question as good or bad, and debate that till the world ends.
Often the issue with downvoting, is it "isn't useful to WHO?" Well I dont give a flying leap about your question, so it isnt useful to me :-). I dont want to see the site direction head to that type of question, So get Outta here with it.
When it comes to some of the tactics used to determine how the Tyranny of the Majority will be applied, the eventuality of it will be towards the majority. Creating a site only for the majority.
Does that mean the site is a Social experiment in majority rules, mob and crowd behaviour :-) If it was it is failing in that respect , because even with the crasy mob rules in existance , the site does loosly follow the original intents, and people are on the most part not being left out when they ask questions that the Mob doesnt care about.