Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 48078

Indicates that the feature request will not be implemented, or that a bug will not be fixed at present time.

12 votes
Accepted

Should we remove the [android] tag?

I am strongly objecting the removal this tag. If title and body contain important (non-meta) information about the topic of the question, then there should also be a tag for it—especially with "big" t …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
5 votes
Accepted

Add softwarerecs to vote to migrate option

Software Recommendations has really just gone public—until yesterday, they didn't even have moderators yet. When migrating to sites, you want them to be established first. Which means that they've b …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
5 votes

should questions about [ffmpeg] be moved to Audio-Video production

ffmpeg is computer software. It's not exclusively used by programmers or audio-video experts—it fits perfectly within the scope of Super User. That is not to say questions about ffmpeg are off topic f …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
8 votes
Accepted

Why aren't spam and offensive answers simply deleted from the database?

A good reason to keep these posts around—and I'm not talking about Viagra or Gucci spam, but excessive promotion for file recovery tools et cetera—is to keep the evidence. Note that I'm using the word …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
9 votes

Migrate question from SO?

The whole point is that you don't want to send tons of "exp" (it's actually "reputation") around. I don't see how it would benefit the community, really. That, and the fact that it's really a little …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
5 votes
Accepted

'Preserve' State for keep real bad questions as reference

the system lacks a final bad-question-keep-for-reference state This is by design. Bad questions are only kept for longer if the answers are (or have been) somewhat useful. But even then, at some poi …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
11 votes

Could we show if someone is typing on chat?

It doesn't work reliably anyway. (source: thedoghousediaries.com)
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
8 votes
Accepted

Reopen request for question 384894

Note that I got some good answers to this question too! and Q&A for computer enthusiasts and power users do not conclude that a question is on topic. You can get answers for any question …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
18 votes
Accepted

Close question after some days of acceptance (if user accept the answer)

I am very strongly against this. The whole point of a Q/A site is to generate useful questions and answers. Where would we be if we didn't allow answers to perfectly valid questions anymore? If you …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k
8 votes

Comment vote equilibrium: Ability to vote down

I think we must not forget that comments that are unconstructive (i.e. obsolete) offensive or plain spam can be flagged for moderator attention anyway. So I guess if you feel the need to downvote …
slhck's user avatar
  • 232k