Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with spam
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 621830
24
votes
1
answer
513
views
Which proper action should be taken to handle this suspicious post?
", but the flag declined with this reason:
It's not spam, and that profanity is part of the extension name. … Here are what I asked for:
Should I raise another flag when found other posts with similar manner if this is not obviously a "spam", or just do an edit by removing the offending link? …
- 200