@AlexNye Area 51 stack site has loads of interesting new and old site proposals which never quite make it, i.e "Deserved = Sustainable". If there is sustainable and enthusiastic participation over there, only then is any new site proposal proven to be deserving.

@DanielBeck Much improved, now. Thx.

My intent was to answer the question asked. I did not do that? I want to leave an answer, but only if I actually answer the question. I thought I did that here. ?? I'll rethink...

@Nifle Okay, thanks. You did submit/accept the near identical and even more minor edit you yourself made, though.

I fixed the spelling. I did not attempt to fix the questionable grammar here, as I saw the questioner's intent very clearly. If borderline grammar still passes muster, you should leave it, right? The edit was not too minor, IMO. The edit comments: Fix title and spelling; add tag; add markdown;. I did a lot with little tweaks. I improved it. The Edit Rejector user rejected my edit, then edited it in the same manner but less comprehensively, leaving the title ambiguous whereas I did not. No improvement by that user at all when compared side-to-side with mine.

My comment here is not an answer for you (see my answer below). This a commentary on the question you ask, and I think the title of this question could be improved. How can I improve a shopping question?