I am giving it a rest. Primarily, because I don't think it would look good here for other users to see what you are doing.

As I have never seen anything related to John or anybody other than the Moderator who closed my question, that Moderator was the one and only who seemed to have decided the fate of my question. Your approach is twisted, because you talk about community opinion, but my original issue was that there was no community in it. You are lecturing me about waiting to get 5 votes to reopen the question. Well, I did not know that. I did not know that other people can still see my question even if it is already closed. Still, the fair way would have been to wait for 5 votes to close it, don't you think?

Thank you for the details. Much of this is very useful. Too bad you do it with a tone and attitude which is more offending than helping. The details you show, are not visible to me, they never were, not even now. See the screenshot below.

@Giacomo1968 where would I see that a non-mod user voted to close the question before the moderator actually closed it?

I appreciate everybody's contribution. Looks like this is far more complex than it appeared. But we are making great progress, and the two sides are getting closer. Give me a couple of days to collect and properly phrase my thoughts for the defense. I will edit this post then.

@DavidPostill Thanks for the detailed explanation. I must admit that the perspective you described is one I did not consider. And this does put the decision-to-close under a different evaluation. It would be difficult not to understand this approach, at a certain level I even have to agree with it. Yet, the validity of this perspective AGAINST the question belonging in SuperUser does not seem to contradict the validity of points mentioned here in favour of it. The two sets seem to coexist. Being a moderator is not an easy thing, I conclude. :-)