I think you quite well mean what I meant to say @Ramhound. I have been around for quite a while and I have seen such things go sideways when the intentions were wrong. So trust me please when I say I do this for the good.

I didn't say we want to use SU as our customer support portal. I know how SE communities dislike that. We want to build a community with the help of you guys. In return we invest in various SE sites ourselves because we believe in the SE format as a tool to help people (not customers).

@Ramhound The question was closed after the suggested edit. I wasn't aware of that close reason.

@Mokubai I can understand that. The problem is: our main way of communicating is either through direct contact or SE sites. The product isn't officially released, so there is no documentation available just yet. We are working with some customers which do use the product now and we'd like to help future users solve the same problems they had just now.

Why would we be able to suggest tags if they will never get approved (as long as they are relevant of course!)? I could of course ask a question myself to create it, but what is the point of that?

It is hard to have a tag wiki for a tag that doesn't exist... I would add one if it is there. Sander is a customer of our company.

I admit the wording is slightly better, but I hope you understand this isn't feasible for everyone.

Any thoughts on this one? superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/648322 I am a material expert on that, so for me I think it is useful to have such a tag.

Okay, I can agree with that. Thanks @JourneymanGeek

If I was reviewing that I would have removed the tag and approved then.

@SeanDuggan Thanks. Can you give an example what more you would have edited?

I was looking for an identification tag, but there isn't. What makes the tag you want to decline the edit?