I know about that button, that's why I asked if I am supposed to skip these kind of questions :) the point of reviewing is to understand all the answers well enough to know whether they are correct? That seems too much for me, and probably means I may be doing it wrong. My reviews try to separate the garbage from the honest questions/answers. When I know the answer is wrong, I downvote and typically comment. When I see it is right, I upvote. When I don't know, but consider it to be a valid approach, I review as "No action needed". I only skip when it really is in a grey area IMO.

I still think it is an answer: "If limit is 16GB, it's impossibile that mobo support over 16Gb". This answers the question of whether it is possible to have more than 16 GB in the NAS. It is definitely brief, yes, but it's still an answer, in my eyes.

Makes sense, and seems like a reasonable approach. Thanks!

I'll ask the same I asked Journeyman Geek: What if I find a question in Google, that has no answers? Maybe it's not worth to bounty it; I shouldn't edit the OP's question for my own needs, and asking it again is creating a duplicate thread. Bounties are the only solution?

I am aware of that, and I wasn't the one making the bump, but seeing it made me think about it. Also, I'll edit this thread's title accordingly, thanks!