Timeline for Did I create, then fail my own review audit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 17, 2017 at 20:10 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | Well, I was confused. “First Posts”, “Late Answers” and “Low-Quality Posts” review audits are drawn from posts that have been deleted; apparently this is not the case for “Close Votes” and “Reopen Votes” review audits. | |
| Dec 13, 2017 at 15:06 | comment | added | Excellll | Leaving the review queue to make changes can lead to some goofy outcomes. A couple years ago I managed to dispute my own flag by doing something similar: meta.superuser.com/q/9135/76571 | |
| Dec 8, 2017 at 2:06 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | But this is peculiar because, in my experience, posts don’t become “serious problems” audits until after they’ve been deleted. The system is broken, and it seems to keep getting brokener. … P.S. I believe that Ben’s answer is correct. | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 20:32 | comment | added | fixer1234 | LOL. Glad to see I'm not the only one gotcha'ed by opening a review queue post for context, forgetting that the process originated in a review, and fixing things outside the review queue. | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 19:56 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/938859742251937794 | ||
| Dec 7, 2017 at 3:38 | vote | accept | I say Reinstate Monica | ||
| Dec 7, 2017 at 3:24 | answer | added | Ben N | timeline score: 14 | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 3:16 | history | edited | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2017 at 2:59 | history | asked | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |