Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/super_user/status/965841271926468608
added 18 characters in body
Source Link

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at the user's profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking forthe user to state theany affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated towith the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted each other, it attracted more flags.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.:

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I canwould like to get a clarification about it. Thanks.

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking for user to state the affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated to the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted, it attracted more flags.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I can get a clarification about it. Thanks.

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at the user's profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking the user to state any affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated with the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted each other, it attracted more flags.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message:

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though I don't have any issue with the declined flag, I would like to get clarification about it. Thanks.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
A J
  • 105
  • 1
  • 1
  • 6

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking for user to state the affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated to the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted, it attracted more flagflags.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I can get a clarification about it. Thanks.

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking for user to state the affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated to the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted, it attracted more flag.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I can get a clarification about it. Thanks.

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking for user to state the affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated to the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted, it attracted more flags.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I can get a clarification about it. Thanks.

Source Link
A J
  • 105
  • 1
  • 1
  • 6

A clarification request for declined spam flag

I flagged this post for obvious spam link inserted in the end when posted in Charcoal HQ. Check the first version here.

After looking at profile and the link in the end, I flagged it as spam. I also posted a comment asking for user to state the affiliation to the site. In reply to that comment, he said that he was not affiliated to the site. Since his profile description and his statement contradicted, it attracted more flag.

He later deleted his post. And I got the flag declined notice with the following message.

declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

This declined reason is ambiguous. I guess the evidence is all there in the revision history. Though, I don't have any issue with the declined flag, but I think I can get a clarification about it. Thanks.