Timeline for Why can we only edit our comments for the first five minutes after posting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2012 at 20:17 | comment | added | Breakthrough | Personally I think 5 minutes is a little low, and 10-15 minutes might be better. That being said, I think we do need a time limit regardless, and while I think the current one is a little short, I'd rather have a time limit than to allow unlimited comment edits. | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 18:40 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 17:08 | history | edited | randomMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 13, 2012 at 17:08 | answer | added | randomMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:56 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod | Even more relevant: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/33997/… | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:56 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod | Relevant: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/459/… | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:48 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 141 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:47 | comment | added | terdon | @allquixotic, I know, but what if the comment has a wonderful gem of incredibly insightful information that is absolutely essential for the question (as, of course, is very often the case with my comments :) )? | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:42 | comment | added | allquixotic | jsut fiY yuo cna aslo delet yuor unstighly coments. | |
| Dec 13, 2012 at 16:11 | history | asked | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |