Timeline for Are the review post tests random?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2013 at 12:22 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 25, 2013 at 12:52 | comment | added | ale | For what it's worth, I've only ever run into a review audit here on Super User (three or four of them). I've never gotten a review audit on any of the other Stack Exchange sites where I'm active. | |
| Mar 24, 2013 at 18:04 | comment | added | killermist | I had wondered, in my reviewing about the frequency of "quality-check" questions. One of my problems is that my knowledge of Windows has (intentionally) degraded, so sometimes, I don't know what to do with questions/answers related to Windows. And I was wondering if that was getting me additional quality-check targeting. | |
| Mar 24, 2013 at 14:07 | vote | accept | terdon | ||
| Mar 24, 2013 at 10:09 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 23, 2013 at 17:41 | comment | added | terdon | Maybe you've been a baaad reviewer too :). | |
| Mar 23, 2013 at 17:40 | comment | added | slhck Mod | I can't comment on the frequency without looking at the statistics a little more (will probably do that later), but let's just mention that I also already had 8 or 9 audits for suggested edits. So, even mods aren't exempt from this :) | |
| Mar 23, 2013 at 17:38 | history | asked | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |