Timeline for <kbd> tag looks wrong
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 at 14:27 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 8:39 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod |
While you may be right about what the standard says about tag semantics, nobody on any SE site would use them correctly anyway. How could we, given the limited HTML subset we get? I've been using <sup> and <sub> as a substitute for <small> for years here, because I have to.
|
|
| Apr 17, 2013 at 20:24 | comment | added | Breakthrough |
........lolwut? The never used nested kbd element (e,g, <kbd><kbd>A</kbd></kbd>) looks like a nested key to me, just as it should...
|
|
| Apr 17, 2013 at 16:50 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1939/… related. Basically.. they know its the case, there's no real reason to fix it unless someone intentionally abuses it ;p | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 15:38 | answer | added | allquixotic | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 15:24 | history | asked | kinokijuf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |