Timeline for Design flaw in the review audit system
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 10, 2017 at 19:34 | comment | added | Donald Duck | I suggest that on a high quality post audit in First Posts or Late Answers, there should be a "this is an audit" error message when the user tries to submit the comment, just like in Low Quality Posts audits. | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 6:15 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @fixer1234 You might consider Meta Stack Exchange, but the developers check all Meta Sites, so doesnt matter really.. | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 5:59 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @Sathya: I tagged this as a feature request because It's a proposed change to the system (which doesn't appear to have gone anywhere). Is there a clearer format or better place to post it? | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 16:12 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 13, 2015 at 17:45 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @Scott: I never noticed that, but if that's the case, it's just part of the flaw. They can correct that as part of the fix. | |
| Dec 13, 2015 at 17:31 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | As you know, I agree with you (and the thousands of others who believe that the review system is riddled with bugs, misfeatures, and design flaws). But I have to quibble with you on one point — in the Review Queue (specifically, the First Posts Review Queue), when you add a comment, the "No Action Needed" button is dimmed/disabled (and the "I'm Done" button is enabled), so it's impossible to add a comment and then click "No Action Needed" (so your suggested fix is unworkable, unless you want to further change the system so the "No Action Needed" button stays enabled). | |
| Apr 26, 2015 at 21:13 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/592436388982824960 | ||
| Apr 26, 2015 at 0:31 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 0:17 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 648 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2015 at 4:51 | comment | added | mdpc | I renew my request to put a "dispute" box in the review "result" so that we can all make comments when we do no agree with the review and why. Also you can at that point easily capture the relevent information at that point. | |
| Mar 28, 2015 at 20:45 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2015 at 20:16 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2015 at 18:45 | history | asked | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |