When reading such answers, I find it useful to:
- have the answer edited when an obsolete link is dead (the second link is dead)
- have screenshots to quickly see how the GUI looks like (the question is precisely about GUI tool).
That's what I did with this edit. NB: I used screenshots provided by the authors of the different tools, not my own.
However it was rejected (there was 1 approve vote though) because:
This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.
In order to improve my future posts/edits, what was wrong in editing when a link is dead and by adding screenshots that help to figure out what the GUI tools are (that was the core of the question)?