4

has 24 questions and no wiki. Some of these questions are obviously talking about (175 questions) or (52 questions), but some are talking about a device with touch in the name or even the touch command

Suggestion: There is no consensus among these 24 questions and they should be retagged and burninated. Additionally, the should be edited to reflect the touch command.

3

I retagged them to use and .

Whether is necessary, I don't know. We could just use , it seems to be used for that.

4

Actually, the touch command is the topic that seems to be what this tag should be, to me. Everything else should be able to be under or a possible new . There's no other way of talking about the touch command.

  • I can get on board with this, but it should be a synonym for touch-command – Raystafarian Mar 6 '12 at 15:58
  • 1
    @Raystafarian It needn't be a synonym, really. If the [touch] tag wiki explains what it's about, that's generally fine. Let's split it up in to touchpads, touchscreens, what have you. I like [touch-gestures] as well, but depends on how much use we have for that. – slhck Mar 6 '12 at 16:02
  • superuser.com/questions/324108/… would be an example of touch-gestures, where there's no other tag at the moment – Journeyman Geek Mar 6 '12 at 16:06
  • This is a great example where a good tag wiki (excerpt) can prevent confusion. – Daniel Beck Mar 6 '12 at 17:18
  • … given that people actually read it :P – slhck Mar 6 '12 at 18:03
  • 1
    I updated the wiki for touch to reflect it is the touch command (once approved). The re-tagging can begin if it is deemed the appropriate action. The burninating should be off the table per this discussion. – Raystafarian Mar 6 '12 at 20:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .