10

There are a bunch of audio-related tags. In a quick search, I found , , , , , , and .

As per it's tag description, is meant for audio-related questions, however it keeps getting used for as well. Obviously a tag cleanup would solve the immediate issue, however this has happened before.

What I propose:

Thoughts?

12

If we do this the way you want, it would be like fighting against the tide. I would rather remove or at least merge it with (after cleaning) and drop the usage of as single channel sound (is that even useful?).

  • 5
    I agree regarding single channel sound. It should be replaced with audio or something similar. mono should be synonymous with mono-framework. – Der Hochstapler Sep 2 '14 at 14:02
  • Sounds good to me, I've edited my question – Robotnik Sep 3 '14 at 0:15
  • Hmm, I've gone deeper into the rabbit hole and also found [stereo], [5.1], [clicking-sound], [surround-sound] and [audio]. I'm gonna edit my question to reflect this – Robotnik Sep 4 '14 at 4:55
3

Why not rename mono to mono-audio tag? This way in the future no one will think of using this tag when asking a question related to mono-framework.

  • I did actually have this as a suggestion, but based on upvotes/comments on Braiam's answer I changed it. – Robotnik Sep 3 '14 at 8:39
  • Well, if mono tag for audio meaning is useful today, then why should it be trashed? It would be more useful to simply rename it into something less ambiguous.. – landroni Sep 3 '14 at 8:55
  • 3
    Exactly what difference there is between some mono channel audio and stereo audio? IMO, that kind of information is worthless to categorize a question and I doubt anyone would try to find a question about mono audio (any mono audio experts around?) – Braiam Sep 3 '14 at 15:18
  • I'm in agreement with @Braiam. I've also found other tags that need cleanup. See my edited question – Robotnik Sep 4 '14 at 6:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .