According to W3C,
The SU way of displaying nested kbd
s does, frankly, look like a key-inside-a-key:
Alt+F4
According to W3C,
The SU way of displaying nested kbd
s does, frankly, look like a key-inside-a-key:
Alt+F4
Why would you "nest" keys in the first place? Keys aren't Russian Matryoska dolls.
Just do Ctrl + Alt...
I fail to see what the "bug" is about -- there are no "actual keys or other single units of input" that can't be expressed as <kbd>text here</kbd> + <kbd>text here</kbd>
.
The nested keys is a funny concept that serves no practical purpose, but what would you have it do instead? Automatically add a plus sign that you could just type yourself? Remove the feature so it can't be used because it isn't normally used?
Also, just because I can, have a free tower as a token of my gratitude for posting this enlightening question:
@
kbd
tag to convey its actual meaning: pressing the key, not showing a key within a key. For example <kbd><kbd>Shift</kbd>+<kbd>F3</kbd></kbd>
should be rendered like <kbd>Shift</kbd>+<kbd>F3</kbd>
is rendered now.
kbd
element (e,g,<kbd><kbd>A</kbd></kbd>
) looks like a nested key to me, just as it should...<sup>
and<sub>
as a substitute for<small>
for years here, because I have to.