As things stand right now, is ambiguous. Questions labeled with it refer both to plasma TVs and to the KDE graphical environment, and this doesn't seem correct to me.

I suggest deleting the generic tag and replace it with and to better categorize entries.

  • 8
    This is the perfect place to point out this issue.
    – Daniel Beck Mod
    Apr 22, 2013 at 9:45
  • would (wouldn't?) plasma-workspace-kde be somewhat more precise?
    – Journeyman Geek Mod
    Apr 22, 2013 at 10:01
  • Yes, I suppose that will deeply describe what is talked about, even if AFAIK the only Plasma Workspace around is the KDE one and so it may be redundant. Anyway, my point was to separate the generic "plasma" tag, and of course the how's are to be debated.
    – Sekhemty
    Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04

1 Answer 1


I'm very much in favor of this.

sounds fine. For the KDE workspaces, I'd prefer or even just .

It's done. I went with . is now a synonym for .

  • 2
    I think anything related to plasma-tv shouldn't be tagged as such. I can't think of a situation that knowing the tag "plasma-tv" is helpful to the question at all. Apr 22, 2013 at 16:07
  • @KronoS: Seems to me like it's just as legit as CRT and LCD. Wouldn't you agree? Apr 22, 2013 at 16:11
  • 5
    IMO those should be burninated as well, but then again I'm pretty prejudiced against the lesser than detailed tags. To me they're about as useful as Microsoft or Apple which give me absolutely no detail into the problem really. Apr 22, 2013 at 17:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .