-8

When @ at someone, it would be good to know when he/she types an answer. Just like in popular IMs like Facebook, Gmail etc.

10

I disagree, basically because we aren't an IM client - we're a chat room. I think all that would do is just add more data for the servers to transmit, and doesn't really benefit us as a whole in the end.

Also it's slightly creepy I find.. Much easier to just wait for that sound you hear when someone @'s you back.

It's also a bit ineffective when you have 20+ people in the room.

  • 1
    Dat suspense when you see: "Clippy is typing..." – iglvzx Aug 14 '12 at 21:38
11

It doesn't work reliably anyway.

http://thedoghousediaries.com/comics/uncategorized/2011-12-26-59358b5.png

  • 4
    ahahahhahaa. perfect. – Sathyajith Bhat Mar 15 '12 at 12:49
  • @slhck So I would wait days for reply? – Boris_yo Mar 15 '12 at 13:35
  • I agree with Simon Sheehan but this example may just be due to a bad algorithm for detecting whether someone is writing. – N.N. Mar 15 '12 at 15:00
  • 6
    @N.N. Either that, or people are really stopping to type frequently. Which, frankly, happens to me way too often. It really makes me nervous. – slhck Mar 15 '12 at 15:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .