13

An anonymous user made the following edit to the answer I gave to this question

The edit is merely a "thank you" note. So it doesn't seem to be a "valid" edit and more something that should have been added as a comment.

The user who asked the question has a rep of 1 now and thus can't add comments I believe, which might be why she opted for an edit.

However rejecting the edit might appear impolite or ungrateful. Any recommendations?

| |
  • 5
    Do note that in some cases even users with 1 rep can add comments as explained in the FAQ. It's a tiny footnote at the end of the privileges table, but it's there. So I think there's no escuse for a "thank you" edit. – devius Jun 1 '12 at 13:07
  • @devius The edit would be attributed to the unregistered user. It looks like she trashed her browser cookies, or changed the browser. – Daniel Beck Jun 1 '12 at 18:04
26

Such edits should be rejected. The edit adds nothing but noise to the answer; I don't believe it's impolite.

| |
  • 6
    You should however leave a comment letting him know that the appropriate way to say "this worked" is to click the checkmark. – nhinkle Jun 1 '12 at 17:50
  • 1
    Looks like [x] invalid edit to me. – Daniel Beck Jun 1 '12 at 18:05
6

I certainly would not accept such an edit. If we're supposed to remove this sort of content from posts, why should we approve edits that add such meaningless content?

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .